ramblings of an immigrant son

Archive for the ‘Pop Culture’ Category

Believers and Opportunists: A Personal Conundrum

In Activism, Ethics, Health, Huxley, Literature, morality, Opinions, Philosophy, Pop Culture, society, Spirituality on February 11, 2013 at 4:17 am

Are you a vegetarian and find yourself in awkward situations where for instance your meat loving friends, who organized a barbeque night, mix the tofu dogs with the beef patties? Are you an anti-establishment Left-a-Saurus that reads Naomi Klein, Noam Chomsky, and Slavoj Žižek by day, but hits that generic Irish-looking pub by night; you know, the one with the overpriced big-brand beers, forever glowing big-screens, and over-worked-under-paid staff? Are you among the music aristocracy (you know who you are), that despite claiming to have a taste in music that is nothing less than critically-acclaimed, shamefully enjoy tuning in to the latest poptacular hit when you think nobody is noticing?

Well, for those of us that are committed to some belief or another, we’ve all found ourselves in a situation very much similar to the examples given above. As I approach my thirties, I must confess that when it comes to staying constant with personal values and beliefs,  I have certainly given more ground than kept. More often than not, I try to write this off as being a natural growth process, a coming of age even. It becomes all too tempting to romanticize these changes of heart as being akin to Kuhnian Shifts, regular but revolutionary transformations in the sort of problems and solutions I prioritize in my daily life. To a certain extent, this point of view finds validation and yet… when I consider to what extent I have remained a Believer vs. an Opportunist in different instances, it seems that I have fallen into the latter category far more than I would like to admit. This has especially become apparent in my consumer choices, where an affordable coffee and pastry has gained preference over the fair-trade-organic-environmental-conscious options.  It has also become noticeable in my attitude towards alternative and even opposing ideologies, where I am willing to accommodate and even sympathize with an individual or group’s insistence that animal consumption is an integral part of their cultural life.

So where does that leave me exactly? Am I being a fence-sitting hypocrite? A pathological cherry-picker? Dare I say it: a liberal? In his controversial work The Continent of Circe, cultural-political commentator Nirad Chaudhuri warns his readers that in Post-Independence India, the majority of the radical ‘modern world’ thinking college students become the staunchest of  traditionalists by their thirties. Much like the baby boomers that traded peace and love for financial success and stability or Gen X’s trade-in of Grunge ripped jeans for Gap Khakis, am I merely a fly on a web of an insidious ‘If you can’t beat ’em, join ’em’ phenomenon? It’s a scary and unsettling thought.

Maybe I’m just making a big deal. I mean I can still say with confidence that I am personally a committed believer in Ahimsa (a Hindu ethic of non-violence), Human Rights, Environmentalism, Social Justice, and so on. Nonetheless, like the comedian Louis CK humourously pointed out about himself, there undeniably exists a gap between what I believe and what I practice. I’d like to say that I am fully committed to rectifying the situation and going back to living up to earlier expectations; however, all I would be doing is lying to myself. For one thing, as the author of Brave New World, Aldous Huxley, wisely cautions elsewhere, “too much consistency is as bad for the mind as it is for the body. Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead.” In craving an overall healthy, ethical, and dynamic existence, I’m inclined to agree with Huxley. Secondly, making such a promise is easier said than done. Even if I desired to turn back the clock and put opportunism aside, can all self-ascribed beliefs be sustained and even so, at what cost? Interacting with individuals from all walks of life, it would be reckless and possibly harmful to overlook complexity and compassion in the name of ideological commitment.

So here we are, no easy solutions or satisfying conclusions. Being mindful of a willingness to compromise on personal ideals and the pros and cons of doing so certainly seems promising. It may lead to certain changes that would at the very least decrease the gap between what I preach and what I practice. Nonetheless, it is difficult to proceed with a clear sense of what certain changes are desirable, let alone feasible. Perhaps too then, through encounters with different life experiences and unexpected circumstances, I will increasingly acquire a balanced approach. For now, at least, it may be all that can be hoped for.

Advertisements